Understanding the Differences Between EQF and ISCED: Two Global Tools for Classifying Education
- OUS Academy in Switzerland
- Jun 25
- 4 min read
In an increasingly globalized education landscape, the need for transparent, consistent, and comparable qualification systems has become essential. Among the most widely recognized international frameworks serving this purpose are the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Although both tools aim to organize education systems for better understanding and comparison, they serve very different purposes, are used by different institutions, and function in distinct ways.
This article explores the core differences between EQF and ISCED and explains how each contributes to education quality, mobility, and recognition across borders.
What is EQF?
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) is a regional framework developed by the European Union. It provides a reference structure of eight levels that describe what a learner knows, understands, and is able to do—learning outcomes—regardless of where or how a qualification was acquired.
Key features of EQF:
Focus: It emphasizes learning outcomes, not inputs such as duration or institutional prestige.
Purpose: EQF serves to align national qualification frameworks (NQFs) across Europe.
Structure: It has eight levels, from basic general education (Level 1) to doctoral-level learning (Level 8).
Scope: Though originally EU-based, the EQF is increasingly used as a model in other regions.
The EQF allows for transparent comparison of qualifications across different countries, enabling student mobility and workforce integration in line with the Bologna Process and the Lisbon Recognition Convention.
What is ISCED?
The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) is a framework developed by UNESCO. It serves as the global reference for collecting and comparing education statistics and classifying educational programs worldwide.
Key features of ISCED:
Focus: It classifies educational programs and credentials based on content and complexity.
Purpose: ISCED is used for international statistics, monitoring, and reporting, especially by global agencies such as UNESCO, OECD, and the World Bank.
Structure: The latest version, ISCED 2011, has nine levels ranging from early childhood education (ISCED 0) to doctoral or equivalent (ISCED 8).
Scope: It applies to all countries, offering a universal taxonomy for understanding how national systems relate.
ISCED is used to standardize education data collection in cross-national studies and reports like the UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report and OECD’s Education at a Glance.
EQF vs. ISCED: Key Differences
Feature | EQF | ISCED |
Developer | European Union | UNESCO |
Purpose | Reference tool to compare national qualifications | Statistical classification of education programs |
Scope | Primarily Europe (with growing global influence) | Global (all UNESCO member states) |
Users | Policy makers, educators, employers | Researchers, statisticians, international organizations |
Basis | Learning outcomes (knowledge, skills, competence) | Education levels, program structure, and complexity |
Levels | 8 EQF levels | 9 ISCED levels |
Focus | Recognizing and comparing qualifications | Tracking education data and levels |
Application | Qualifications frameworks, diploma recognition | International statistics and surveys |
Examples of Use | Erasmus+ mobility, NQF alignment | UNESCO statistics, SDG 4 monitoring |
Complementary, Not Competing
Despite their differences, EQF and ISCED are not competing tools. In fact, they complement each other.
EQF is a tool for national and institutional use, particularly useful for qualification recognition, curriculum alignment, and employability strategies within and outside the EU.
ISCED is primarily a statistical tool used by international organizations to compare education systems, trends, and progress toward policy goals like the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
For example, a country may use EQF to reform its vocational education pathways, while it reports educational attainment levels to UNESCO using ISCED.
Practical Implications
For Students and WorkersEQF helps students and jobseekers understand how their qualifications relate to others across Europe and beyond, facilitating study abroad and job mobility.
For Governments and Policy MakersISCED provides reliable comparative data on enrollment rates, graduation outcomes, and education spending for evidence-based policy development.
For Employers and InstitutionsEQF levels help recruiters and HR departments understand the real value of a qualification across borders, while ISCED allows for education benchmarking.
Final Thoughts
While EQF and ISCED both help make education systems more transparent and interconnected, they operate with different logics and audiences. Understanding their roles allows governments, institutions, and individuals to make better-informed decisions about qualifications, career planning, and international cooperation.
As global mobility increases and cross-border education becomes more common, these frameworks—when used correctly—can bridge systems, improve comparability, and support lifelong learning strategies across the world.
References
The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF)
ISCED 2011: International Standard Classification of Education
Comparing Qualification Frameworks Across Regions
Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators
Understanding Education Systems: UNESCO Reports
By
Dr. Habib Al Souleiman is an european academic and international education consultant with over 20 years of experience across Europe, the Middle East, and Central Asia. Renowned for his expertise in management, law, education, and cybersecurity, he has contributed extensively to institutional development and academic reform. He holds multiple academic degrees, including an Honours BA in Management, an MBA, a Master of Laws, and several doctoral-level qualifications.
Comments